0
Skip to Content
Dr M Rushton Consultancy
Home
About
Services
Blog
Contact
Dr M Rushton Consultancy
Home
About
Services
Blog
Contact
Home
About
Services
Blog
Contact
The Trolley Problem
Critical Thinking, Ethics Dr M Rushton 5/16/26 Critical Thinking, Ethics Dr M Rushton 5/16/26

The Trolley Problem

The Trolley Problem is an ethical dilemma which enquiries whether it would be right to sacrifice one person to save five others. It comes in various flavours but usually is introduced via two scenarios.

Read More
The Prisoner’s Dilemma
Critical Thinking Dr M Rushton 4/16/26 Critical Thinking Dr M Rushton 4/16/26

The Prisoner’s Dilemma

Imagine two prisoners who are rational and self-interested. The Police catch them on a minor offence. The Police suspect that they were also involved in a more serious offence but have no evidence for this.

Read More
Inference to the best explanation
Knowledge and Inquiry, Theory of Knowledge, Critical Thinking Dr M Rushton 4/2/26 Knowledge and Inquiry, Theory of Knowledge, Critical Thinking Dr M Rushton 4/2/26

Inference to the best explanation

Inference to the best explanation is a form of reasoning where one infers that the hypothesis, among competing hypotheses, which best explains the available data is likely true.

Read More
What is a slippery slope argument?
Knowledge and Inquiry, Theory of Knowledge, Critical Thinking Dr M Rushton 3/13/26 Knowledge and Inquiry, Theory of Knowledge, Critical Thinking Dr M Rushton 3/13/26

What is a slippery slope argument?

This is an informal fallacy which occurs when an initial, seemingly minor, action will inevitably trigger a chain reaction, leading to increasingly severe, undesirable outcomes, often without sufficient evidence for each step.

Read More
Gettier cases
Knowledge and Inquiry, Theory of Knowledge, Critical Thinking Dr M Rushton 2/25/26 Knowledge and Inquiry, Theory of Knowledge, Critical Thinking Dr M Rushton 2/25/26

Gettier cases

The American philosopher Edmund Gettier argued in a famous paper in 1963 that we can have a JTB and yet still not have knowledge…

Read More
Deductive and inductive arguments
Knowledge and Inquiry, Theory of Knowledge, Critical Thinking Dr M Rushton 2/14/26 Knowledge and Inquiry, Theory of Knowledge, Critical Thinking Dr M Rushton 2/14/26

Deductive and inductive arguments

In everyday speech, we say, ‘You make a valid argument’, ‘You have a valid point’, ‘That’s a sound point’, ‘That’s a good argument’, ‘That’s a strong argument’ and so on. This is rather loose-speak.

Read More
What is affirming the consequent?
Knowledge and Inquiry, Theory of Knowledge, Critical Thinking Dr M Rushton 1/16/26 Knowledge and Inquiry, Theory of Knowledge, Critical Thinking Dr M Rushton 1/16/26

What is affirming the consequent?

Affirming the consequent is a logical fallacy whereby the arguer incorrectly concludes the cause (antecedent) because of the effect (consequent).

Read More
What is knowledge?
Knowledge and Inquiry, Theory of Knowledge, Critical Thinking Dr M Rushton 1/15/26 Knowledge and Inquiry, Theory of Knowledge, Critical Thinking Dr M Rushton 1/15/26

What is knowledge?

The branch of Philosophy concerning the nature of knowledge is Epistemology. Philosophers commonly identify three types of knowledge:

Read More
What is modus tollens?
Critical Thinking, Knowledge and Inquiry, Theory of Knowledge Dr M Rushton 1/3/26 Critical Thinking, Knowledge and Inquiry, Theory of Knowledge Dr M Rushton 1/3/26

What is modus tollens?

Modus tollens (Latin for ‘mode that denies’) is a valid form of logical deduction. It is a conditional form (if-then).

Read More
Older Posts

Dr M Rushton Consultancy

2026 - All Rights Reserved